Sustainable Architecture Part 1 : The Misconception
Energy efficiency is just doing more with less-squeezing as
much useful power from as little as possible. For example, the LED bulbs use 75
per cent less energy and last 25 times longer than the incandescent bulbs.
Incandescent lighting and CFLs lose 90 per cent and 80 per cent of their energy
as heat and Infrared Radiations to the surroundings, whereas the LED bulbs are
cool to touch since they only produce minimal heat and no Infrared Radiations.
Thus, we call them ‘Energy-Efficient’. This concept of ‘Energy-Efficiency’ in the 3D structures is used
in the building sector and termed as the ‘Green’ or the ‘Sustainable’
Architecture. The buildings are
designed to provide a significant reduction of the energy needed for heating
and cooling, independently of the energy and of the equipment that will be
chosen to heat or cool the building.
The two aspects of energy-efficiency that are ‘minimizing
the energy loss’ and shifting the resources of energy from non-renewable to
renewable sources are largely covered under the heading of ‘Sustainability’ and
interpreted as one. We need to keep in mind that there is a huge difference
between the two and that we first need to minimize the energy loss to be able
to shift to the use of renewable energy. If we do end up going the other way around,
we might as well fail because the energy that is harnessed through the
renewable resources is in fact much lesser than that which is harnessed through
the non-renewable resources such as coal and petroleum.
Thus, to make a building energy-efficient, we need to follow
the approach given below.
Some of the measures
to start with in order to achieve sustainability are as follows:
1) Bio-climatic
Architecture that focuses on the shape and orientation of the building, solar
protections, and passive solar systems.
2) High performing
building envelope which is done through insulation, high performing glazing and
windows, air-sealed construction, and avoidance of thermal bridges.
3) High
performance-controlled ventilation such as mechanical insulation and heat
recovery.
Some architects and engineers simply discard the idea of
sustainability considering that the construction costs are high. They do not
realize the fact that there is just a mere ‘cost’ of going green and a ‘risk’
of not going ‘green’ that can affect us globally. We need to move to ‘Green/Sustainable Architecture’ since
the building sector accounts for more electricity use than any other sector. It
is not hard to imagine this fact since we spend more than 90 percent of our
time in buildings. Besides, with increasing urbanization, higher in developing
countries, the number and size of buildings in urban areas will increase,
resulting in an increased demand for electricity and other forms of energy
commonly used in buildings. We need to realize that “In reality, construction costs are
not that much more. It simply takes a little more thought and planning.”
Well Written!
ReplyDeleteAmazing!
ReplyDeleteWaiting for the next part!
ReplyDeleteDo read it!
DeleteThank you for sharing this information. It's great!
ReplyDeleteI will continue to share!
DeleteI love the effort!
ReplyDeleteThanks a lot!
DeleteIts great!
ReplyDeleteThank you!
DeleteEnergy is Life!
ReplyDeleteSo true!
DeleteSpot On!
ReplyDeleteThanks a lot, glad you liked it!
DeleteRiwayat Katia, we all need to be part of the solution. A new concept of building less "intrusive" to nature, and our (everyday), smaller planet, were we are just tenant's. All the best in your quest. Best regards.
DeleteTrue that!
DeleteGreat Work!
ReplyDeleteThank you!
DeleteDone a great job!
ReplyDeleteKeep it up mann... Do keep posting!
ReplyDeleteI will!
Delete